I think Sam's axles arent full width, they're slightly shorter. Not an issue with 39s, he just can't run big boy tires until his next axle swap.
Quote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 08:51:06 AMQuote from: Doug on April 19, 2017, 08:46:01 AMQuote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 08:32:33 AM#not43'sBigger than 40'sMine aren't even 40's but they are sticky. I hope these are just as sticky as i will probably sell mine and go to a 40. (can't fit a 42.9 due to axle width). I noticed at hale there were a few places where @tcdawg had the clearance to get over stuff where i had to take a different approach to make it.Sam...please explain the axle width comment.Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Quote from: Doug on April 19, 2017, 08:46:01 AMQuote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 08:32:33 AM#not43'sBigger than 40'sMine aren't even 40's but they are sticky. I hope these are just as sticky as i will probably sell mine and go to a 40. (can't fit a 42.9 due to axle width). I noticed at hale there were a few places where @tcdawg had the clearance to get over stuff where i had to take a different approach to make it.
Quote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 08:32:33 AM#not43'sBigger than 40's
#not43's
Quote from: clark123456 on April 19, 2017, 09:25:22 AMQuote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 08:51:06 AMQuote from: Doug on April 19, 2017, 08:46:01 AMQuote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 08:32:33 AM#not43'sBigger than 40'sMine aren't even 40's but they are sticky. I hope these are just as sticky as i will probably sell mine and go to a 40. (can't fit a 42.9 due to axle width). I noticed at hale there were a few places where @tcdawg had the clearance to get over stuff where i had to take a different approach to make it.Sam...please explain the axle width comment.Sent from my SM-G930V using TapatalkThe frame on a jk gets alot wider right near the firewall. My 39's at full lock rub the frame hard already. 42.9's would be really bad and probably also get into the sheet metal at the back of the wheel opening. @Doug and @BigPrince aren't your axles 72" wide? Mine are only 69" wide.
Quote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 09:34:46 AMQuote from: clark123456 on April 19, 2017, 09:25:22 AMQuote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 08:51:06 AMQuote from: Doug on April 19, 2017, 08:46:01 AMQuote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 08:32:33 AM#not43'sBigger than 40'sMine aren't even 40's but they are sticky. I hope these are just as sticky as i will probably sell mine and go to a 40. (can't fit a 42.9 due to axle width). I noticed at hale there were a few places where @tcdawg had the clearance to get over stuff where i had to take a different approach to make it.Sam...please explain the axle width comment.Sent from my SM-G930V using TapatalkThe frame on a jk gets alot wider right near the firewall. My 39's at full lock rub the frame hard already. 42.9's would be really bad and probably also get into the sheet metal at the back of the wheel opening. @Doug and @BigPrince aren't your axles 72" wide? Mine are only 69" wide.UD60s are 69.5" wms, stock is 68.5", Superduty's are 72". Sam would need spacers or less bs (believe he's at 4") for steering clearance. As well, to run more than 40s on a JK, you have to run no fenders, metalcloak overlines, or run no fenders and cut a lot of the body. To clear the Pitbulls on 72" wms, 4"be Racelines, AS had to roll my rear body line, run a lot of bump, and cut the corners off my grille.
Quote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 09:34:46 AMQuote from: clark123456 on April 19, 2017, 09:25:22 AMQuote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 08:51:06 AMQuote from: Doug on April 19, 2017, 08:46:01 AMQuote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 08:32:33 AM#not43'sBigger than 40'sMine aren't even 40's but they are sticky. I hope these are just as sticky as i will probably sell mine and go to a 40. (can't fit a 42.9 due to axle width). I noticed at hale there were a few places where @tcdawg had the clearance to get over stuff where i had to take a different approach to make it.Sam...please explain the axle width comment.Sent from my SM-G930V using TapatalkThe frame on a jk gets alot wider right near the firewall. My 39's at full lock rub the frame hard already. 42.9's would be really bad and probably also get into the sheet metal at the back of the wheel opening. @Doug and @BigPrince aren't your axles 72" wide? Mine are only 69" wide.Well, we'll see how this works on a TJ frame. The ultimate 60s have a 6.75" throw where the normal full width has a n 8"throw.Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Quote from: clark123456 on April 19, 2017, 09:37:12 AMQuote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 09:34:46 AMQuote from: clark123456 on April 19, 2017, 09:25:22 AMQuote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 08:51:06 AMQuote from: Doug on April 19, 2017, 08:46:01 AMQuote from: Cranvilstan on April 19, 2017, 08:32:33 AM#not43'sBigger than 40'sMine aren't even 40's but they are sticky. I hope these are just as sticky as i will probably sell mine and go to a 40. (can't fit a 42.9 due to axle width). I noticed at hale there were a few places where @tcdawg had the clearance to get over stuff where i had to take a different approach to make it.Sam...please explain the axle width comment.Sent from my SM-G930V using TapatalkThe frame on a jk gets alot wider right near the firewall. My 39's at full lock rub the frame hard already. 42.9's would be really bad and probably also get into the sheet metal at the back of the wheel opening. @Doug and @BigPrince aren't your axles 72" wide? Mine are only 69" wide.Well, we'll see how this works on a TJ frame. The ultimate 60s have a 6.75" throw where the normal full width has a n 8"throw.Sent from my SM-G930V using TapatalkYou're cutting anything in the way so you should be good.
i wonder what the concerns are about running wheel spacers and such big tires. I know 1 ton trucks run them alot and i've seen bouncers run them. Im sure for what we do they would hold up fine.